Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated for ethical standards and legal ability
Featured in Washingtonian Magazine 2014 Year End Edition
Avvo Rating Top Attorney Criminal Defense Badge
The National Top 100 Trial Layers Badge
The American Trial Lawyers Association Badge
Maryland State Bar Association Badge
American Immigration Lawyers Association Badge
American INNS of Court Badge
DC Bar Badge
Iranian American Bar Association Badge
Montgomery County Bar Badge
P.G. County Bar Badge

Can Police Stop Your Vehicle Based on a Visual Estimate of Speed?

Earlier this year the 4th Circuit held that an officer’s visual estimate of speed in slight excess of the speed limit, without any corroboration, does not suffice as a basis for probable cause to initiate a traffic stop.

Sean Sowards was stopped by Deputy James Elliot for speeding after Deputy Elliot visually estimated Sowards’ vehicle traveling 75 mph in a 70 mph zone. No radar or other method was used to corroborate Deputy Elliot’s visual estimate. During the traffic stop, Deputy Elliot had a canine trained in drug detection sniff the outside of Sowards’ vehicle, resulting in the discovery of 10 kilograms of cocaine.

Before trial, Sowards moved to suppress the evidence on the basis that Deputy Elliot lacked probable cause to initiate the traffic stop in violation of the 4th Amendment. The trial court found that the Deputy was trained to estimate speeds and therefore he had probable cause to believe a traffic violation had occurred based on the speeding violation.

On Appeal, the 4th Circuit held that the 4th Amendment does not allow blanket approval for the proposition that an officer’s visual speed estimate will always suffice as a basis for probable cause to initiate a traffic stop. Instead, the question remains one of reasonableness. A primary factor to examine is whether a vehicle’s speed is estimated to be significantly exceeding the speed limit or slightly over the speed limit. In examining case law from other jurisdictions and applying some common sense, there cannot be any degree of certainty with human estimation of vehicle speed within 5-10 mph. The reasonableness of officer’s visual estimate that a vehicle is traveling in slight excess of the speed limit may be supported by other evidence such as radar, pacing methods or various other factors. In sum, the Court recognized that an officer’s visual estimate of a vehicle traveling in slight excess of the speed limit essentially amounts to a guess of the vehicles speed and cannot suffice as a basis for probable cause to initiate a traffic stop.

Client Reviews

He was great in dedicating his time to research all possibilities of the laws and status to determine the best way to fight the case. He advised and explained what was in our best interest. He would explain exactly what he was filing with the court and what would be mailed to opposing counsel. If...

Melanie

Mr. Pishevar is probably the best attorney money can buy; WHY??? Because he digs deep into your case and assures his client that failure is not an option. He's been my loyal, dedicated, and helpful legal advisor for nearly 10 years - and I have never once considered alternate counsel. By the way -...

Brenda

Contact Us

  1. 1 Over 20 Years of Experience
  2. 2 Creative and Cost-Effective Representation
  3. 3 History of High-Profile Successes
Fill out the contact form or call us at 301.279.8773 to schedule your consultation.

We Accept the Following Credit Cards:

Mastercard LogoVisa Logo