Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated for ethical standards and legal ability
Featured in Washingtonian Magazine 2014 Year End Edition
Avvo Rating Top Attorney Criminal Defense Badge
The National Top 100 Trial Layers Badge
The American Trial Lawyers Association Badge
Maryland State Bar Association Badge
American Immigration Lawyers Association Badge
American INNS of Court Badge
DC Bar Badge
Iranian American Bar Association Badge
Montgomery County Bar Badge
P.G. County Bar Badge

Maryland Brake Light Regulations

Author: Roxy Araghi Date: October 24, 2012

Through two separate sections of the Maryland Annotated Code Transportation Article, Maryland law requires that all motor vehicles have two brake lights. A third brake light, or center brake light, is not required under these laws. Furthermore, Section 22-206 (a) holds, “every motor vehicle … shall be equipped with at least one stop lamp,” and (b) every vehicle sold after January 1, 1967 “shall be equipped with at least two stop lamps.”

The conflict arises in court when an individual brings forth a case concerning a dispute arising from a stopped vehicle with a burned out, center brake light. Some judges believe that the law simply requires that motor vehicles have two brake lights. Judges with this line of reasoning will choose to dismiss cases centered on problems due to a third brake light. Other judges, however, make decisions on the notion that the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) requires all equipment originally installed in motor vehicles to be maintained in working order. Thus, if a vehicle was originally equipped with the center brake light of concern, such a judge will move forward with the case. These variations in legal interpretation have proven to be challenging for the State.

In fact, any variations in the interpretation of the law and regulations released by the state raise concerns about the consistency of judicial decisions. Such differences can cause law enforcement officials to question their responsibilities and citizens to be uncertain about their obligations under the law. One would instead expect that a regulation transcribed in the Maryland Annotated Code would be able to determine the basis for the conclusion of an issue without interference from conflicting rules. As can be seen above, however, in reality, this is not always the case.

Client Reviews

He was great in dedicating his time to research all possibilities of the laws and status to determine the best way to fight the case. He advised and explained what was in our best interest. He would explain exactly what he was filing with the court and what would be mailed to opposing counsel. If...

Melanie

Mr. Pishevar is probably the best attorney money can buy; WHY??? Because he digs deep into your case and assures his client that failure is not an option. He's been my loyal, dedicated, and helpful legal advisor for nearly 10 years - and I have never once considered alternate counsel. By the way -...

Brenda

Contact Us

  1. 1 Over 20 Years of Experience
  2. 2 Creative and Cost-Effective Representation
  3. 3 History of High-Profile Successes
Fill out the contact form or call us at 301.279.8773 to schedule your consultation.

We Accept the Following Credit Cards:

Mastercard LogoVisa Logo